More evidence

Members of James Dobson's group just can't stop expressing themselves in ways that appear to them to be reasonable, but reveal their true priorities to be anything but. In a much -linked Washington Post article, a spokesperson for Focus on the Family has this to say to their fellow travelers, in defense of the partial-birth abortion ban.

The old procedure, which is still legal, involves using forceps to pull the baby apart in utero, which means there is greater legal liability and danger of internal bleeding from a perforated uterus. So we firmly believe there will be fewer later-term abortions as a result of this ruling.

Nevermind that, if they are correct, a higher percentage of those later-term abortions will result in perforated uteruses.